Well, probability can be an overrated thing. There's
   experiential knowledge too, which is a numberless thing.

   My mid 20s, I was heavily into religious questing. Raised
   Methodist, which didn't really have a Devil concept per se, more
   psychology than anything, and a "do good things / be good" way
   about it. I'm glad for it. Thought the place needed more
   candles.

   Did the Buddhist, Unitarian, Quaker, Anglican, among many
   others, almost became a Catholic priest, then ended up finding
   Eastern Orthodox in the yellow pages and checked it out.
   Converted. Stayed at a monastery for few weeks. Learned much,
   even came up with a retirement plan. Moved to Florida, studied
   science in my spare time for about 10 of those years, getting
   all quantum-mystified and holographic-nature-of-reality stuff
   until I saw the religiousity in *that* and now, well, in a
   process of synthesis I suppose.

   The experiential nature of mystical awareness (man that sounds
   stupid and new age-y but I need coffee) is missing from
   probability, objectivism, numbers, etc. It's the trouble of
   categorization: How do you categorize when there is only one and
   no other for contrast/comparison?

   So, yeah. Still staying open on the question. I also have a very
   analogical view of God; it's a word. It has analogous forms in
   areas that don't seem related to religion but are. Anything
   that's has a deep ? and a bunch of people going "ooh and ahh"
   over it, well, there ya go. That's their God.