Loving has no independent existence. There is always a subject;
   there is loving, there is being loved, and sometimes loving goes
   many ways at once.

   I can love everybody. It's series of active feelings in motions
   internally that show themselves through words, actions, deeds
   but in a veiled way; for the action of loving isn't entirely
   visible, in much the same way that we have private minds that
   are 'minding'.

   Mind is another good example: It's not really a noun per se;
   it's a verb. You're thinking. A mind is only a mind when it is
   thinking; the activeness is hiding within the noun form of
   'mind', but it's still there.

   But in cases of Love; there's really no realm of love per se.
   There is loving. I am loving [who?]. I am being loved [by whom?]

   The noun form Love is handy but it's misleading.

   What is love? Well, ask: what is emotion?

   Let's go etymology:

   1570s, "a (social) moving, stirring, agitation," from Middle
   French *motion (16c.), from Old French emouvoir "stir up"
   (12c.), from Latin emovere "move out, remove, agitate," from
   assimilated form of ex- "out" (see ex-) + movere "to move" (see
   move (v.)).

   Movement. Moving out. an Agitation. Emotions are a "moving out
   of"