I never understood the bruhaha over the double-slit experiment
   anyway.

   They know they're being watched even though they appear to have
   no eyes.

   It spooks us humans out because we can't find the eyes they see
   with.

   But to me, it just means there's connections between things
   happening that we barely understand with numbers, but the idea
   that "not everything can be objectively measured in a pure
   environment like a laboratory because there *is* no objectively
   pure environment" is easy enough to figure out.

   Example: When psychologists interview kids and generate theories
   of child development from these interviews, are they REALLY
   studying child development in general, or are they actually
   studying "How children react to authority figures who ask them
   questions?"

   Sometimes the hypothesis and conclusions are both wrong and the
   better explanation INCLUDES the scientists themselves.