I agree. The weak form of Whorf-Sapir I can stand behind, and in
   fact, Embodied Cognition, which utilizes
   metaphor-as-basis-for-human-comprehension, pretty much requires
   it to be valid.

   Some CogSci work has been done that verifies some of it; for
   example, the emotion of distance of a person activates the same
   areas that the brain uses for seeing something far away, and the
   feeling of a broken heart is apparently the same as a physical
   heart attack in the pain areas.

   Considering that languages use different metaphors, I suspect
   the weak Whorf-Sapir hypothesis is likely correct. That's my
   belief at present anyway. Always subject to change.