I'm not proving right or wrongness. Just the ability of humans
   to comprehend difficult constructs and how they relate them to
   their cultural-historical knowledge.

   In the case of QM, Aubrey Terrill saw my simple point right
   away.

   You're making it far too complicated. Thank you and yes, I do.
   That's why I'm still here. I learn with every exchange with
   people. I never waste a word for my own purposes, even if
   someone doesn't comprehend me properly. My baseline for Trinity
   is simple. Ecumenical Councils. Church as it stood in 325-500ad
   approximately. All the afterwards stuff? Doesn't matter.

   Also, there is most DEFINITELY hot debate in QM. There are MANY
   competing theories, each with their own cheering squad.

   It's far from a fixed in stone thing. And yes, he is. He has the
   sun rising in Florida. Thank you and Gerald Bogan for your time
   tonight. I enjoyed it and have gained a lot of material (my own
   words, I don't copy other people's) for some ridiculous book
   that will sell no copies. Not a word wasted.

   My narcissistic bed awaits. and I enjoyed our time together and
   will catch up tomorrow if there's more for whatever reason that
   may be smile emoticon