Well, the article has a strong bias and strong biased articles I
   take with a bit of salt, especially when there's talk of
   conspiracy. BUT that being said: I believe it's more or less
   correct. It's doesn't fit the news profile people want to hear.
   We need clear cut good guys and bad guys and the lines are drawn
   and the people chosen. If someone doesn't fit neatly into that
   profile of what we expect to see in the news, it's put in small
   print in a far off page. But if it fits the "larger story" being
   told, it gets front page.