I'm focusing on "What's good". Sometimes I focus on what's not
   good - when politics and fundamentalist thinking gets mixed into
   it, just as I sometimes focus on what's not good with the
   single-blind peer review process for peer reviewed papers. [WHY
   they don't switch to double-blind has some of the lamest
   excuses] But, I think it's possible to both simultaneously.
   Focus on what's good and use it while ALSO combating what's
   broken.