Subjectively, linguistic adjectification beneficial with regards
   to the passification, normalisiticalization and obfuscation of
   meaning, propensitizes unilaterally the job creation
   capabilities within many sectors prone to otherwise being
   revealed as the trivial things they really are. == When I type
   things out on my smartphone, I imagine my tap is activating a
   number of hidden telegraph operators in my phone, converting the
   button press to correspond to sounds in 'dit dot' form more
   appropriate to today's needs, but still dit-dots and that
   there's millions of potential telegraph operator jobs lost due
   to this horrendous use of new technology. == I know smile
   emoticon It's swapping one code for another tongue emoticon [I
   learned morse code in boy scouts and when modems came out (well,
   when *I* got one - my first was 300bps), I'd type a letter and
   listen for the code. I could ALMOST hear what I was typing with
   my eyes closed. If I did it slow enough i could recognize a few
   letters well. But with current speeds now, we'd have to slow
   down the audio tremendously. But in my mind, it's no different
   at all, just faster and with better error correction. == oh and
   compression algorithms. The compression algorithms make it a
   little tougher to decode the audio 'cause then I'd need a pen
   and paper and a calculator. Still not impossible but tricky. ==
   Lots of horses lost their jobs with the car. But they're horses.
   Sorry fellas. tongue emoticon I'm not worried though. If enough
   jobs are lost to robotics + automation (as they've been doing
   for hundreds of years, ever since the weaving machine in the
   17th century), we'll make new ones. And if there's not enough
   new ones, well, then those tech companies eating up all of the
   jobs will just have to share by increased taxation so that
   people can stay home to eat doritos and play video games on a
   more nationwide scale. tongue emoticon