I have a hyperphysical view of things... probably more than
   most. But I also don't believe in the dichotomy between material
   and immaterial. But I also have a weird view of Time that allows
   for things not arrow-of-time-like. AND... I also believe our
   senses and deductive capabilities are, while fantastic, are and
   will always be limited because neither we nor anything we create
   (which would include AI) can exceed whatever the maximal
   capabilities of human beings _could_ potentially be. [I can
   explain further but I'll be concise] So... how can it? It does.
   Is it immaterial? I suppose it could be construed well enough as
   immaterial but I also see fictions and beliefs and certainties
   and lies as very physical things as well. But our understandings
   of things are based upon analogies and yes, I see analogies as
   physical as well. Yet, not all things might be fully
   discernible. So... yeah. Call it word-salad. Hard to explain a
   philosophy in a few sentences smile emoticon == Indeed. It has
   to be experienced and even then, not all things are given to
   analogies and therefore not all things are explainable without
   experience to analogize to. ==