Thing about me is, I don't have intentions. I just create. It's
   in a [bracket]. How it connects throughout the continuum I don't
   know, except it's not really a continuum but more like music,
   where a theme is hinted at but not expressed, whose intention is
   uncertain until unveiled - if it ever is, and comprehension is
   not gained until finality and then, like a butterfly effect,
   memory backfills to origin, uncovering purpose and intent, which
   is unknown to the author at the origin point. == I like Brian
   Greene but he's missing some very interesting possibilities
   there. He's limited to expanding block view/arrow view, which is
   fine for what he does for a living but it's not the only way to
   look at things. == "at least we don't think we have". He can
   feel safe and secure if he likes and he can reassure his fandom
   that that's the case. If it works for you, go for it. == I've
   been a Doctor Who fan since I was 8 yrs old. I just turned 44.
   Been turning Time over in my head for a long time now, not
   restricted in my area of study to Theoretical Physics. [I almost
   was], like Brian Greene is. == Professionals are often biased in
   their worldview because their profession provides a lens through
   which they see reality. It doesn't invalidate but it does
   provide constraints they follow, often unknowingly because they
   are within a particular universe which has cohesiveness, a
   community, etc etc. So, for example: it's natural to expect
   Dawkins to see everything as evolution. He's the strongest
   example because it's so obvious tongue emoticon == I like
   professionals. They're good at what they're good at. But when
   they step out of their fields, they sometimes sound really.. odd
   ... to outsiders. See: Hawking when he's not talking about black
   hole physics. I like him but... wow... some things he says are
   like... woah, really? === love rhymes and rhythms - I hate how
   the two words in English are hard to spell and look alike. ==