+++++++++---- +#########++##- -#####++## +## #####++## -+# +####+++# +#+ -########+##- -########+##- -#######+-##+ +########+##+ +#####-##++## ######+##-+## ######### -##- -#########--##- +##+#+#+++++##+- +###+#+++#-++#+- +#####+#+++--#+- -########++-+## -#######- -## #####-##-+#- -######+-## ######+-#- -#####-## +++++ ++ +- + ++ + ++---+ -#+--++- -#---+++ +##++++# ---- D E S I G N T H O U G H T S ---- I am a student of graphic design at UBA, Argentina. The teachings of my field of study are to always focus above all on "selling" something, following trends and exploiting them to get your clients' message across in the most impactful way. The graphic designer has the role of controlling the masses through the impact of the image. And in this capitalist world, it translates to exploiting people's weak points, making them feel incomplete, generating desire in them and then selling them the product. For example, the CocaCola bottle has the turned silhouette of a woman, generating in the viewer an unconscious desire in the very design of the container, entering the eyes before even taste it. However, my interest in design comes from elsewhere. I like the point of being able to share a message in an engagingway that I'm passionate about, but it's something I never take advantage of. It's like I'm resisting the idea of using the image as a mean of control. I really like minimalism, I think that being able to leave a message in the cleanest way possible, without extra things, can make something have a timeless elegance. Following this, I would like to quote Rams' decalogue, which is never superfluous: 1. Good design is innovative. 2. Good design must be useful. 3. Good design is aesthetic. 4. Good design is unobtrusive. 5. Good design is understandable. 6. Good design must be honest. 7. Good design is durable. 8. Good design is meticulous down to the last detail. 9. Good design is sustainable. 10. Good design should be its minimum expression. This decalogue makes what you generate become timeless. A design that can stand the test of time is not governed by fashion, but by functionality, the cocacola bottle is one. I have to say that the gopher network caught my attention for meeting many of the standards of what Rams would consider a good design, it is not perfect, more than anything because of its inaccessibility, I do think that it is somewhat far from being innovative and aesthetic in modern times, but that is entirely subjective. I could go back to 1905, but I think the greatest damage that happened to modernity would be the NeoKitsch. The NeoKitsch, taking advantage of the post-war industry began to mass produce low-quality reproductions of what in the early 1900s were the hobbies of the bourgeoisie to the plebs. The NeoKitsch began to create problems to sell solutions. Now the workers could access luxuries that previously only belonged to the bourgeois, but those luxuries were nothing more than a bunch of useless things that are there only to generate a desire, a artificial need and then be sold as the solution. See most of the things in the room you are in. How much of it is functional and how much is just a Kitsch trinket that adds nothing to your live? It happens to all of us, in this system we were educated to seek happiness in shopping, the vast majority of our desires are manufactured. I like minimalism in terms of functionality. Leave an impact in the simple and honest. I was definitely born in the wrong world, but I want to express my design in a way that is consistent with my philosophy. --------------------------------------- Nexy 24/6/2024