From: gopher-bounce@complete.org Date: Mon Aug 4 19:16:11 2008 Subject: [gopher] Re: Gopherness I don't think the Gopher network would benefit from balkanization at this late stage. On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Jay Nemrow <jnemrow@quix.us> wrote: > I would also be a bit concerned about backward-compatibility (as I > always am). When we talk about changes like this, I suggest we call > the protocol created with modern changes something besides just > "Gopher". Perhaps Goph08 or something like that. Then you could say, > "hey, I run a Goph08 server" or "my client is both Gopher and Goph08 > compatible."