From: gopher-bounce@complete.org
       Date: Mon Aug  4 19:16:11 2008
       Subject: [gopher] Re: Gopherness
       
       I don't think the Gopher network would benefit from balkanization at
       this late stage.
       
       On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Jay Nemrow <jnemrow@quix.us> wrote:
       > I would also be a bit concerned about backward-compatibility (as I
       > always am).  When we talk about changes like this, I suggest we call
       > the protocol created with modern changes something besides just
       > "Gopher".  Perhaps Goph08 or something like that.  Then you could say,
       > "hey, I run a Goph08 server" or "my client is both Gopher and Goph08
       > compatible."