From: gopher-bounce@complete.org Date: Mon Feb 16 20:54:03 2009 Subject: [gopher] Re: New Gopher server and client On Monday 16 February 2009 20:27, Cameron Kaiser wrote: > Well, I guess it brings back the old question of whither Gopher+. I think > it has potential, but I am also sympathetic to the position that it's too > much like HTTP. It *is* certainly a heavier protocol than the glorious > simplicity of standard Gopher. Well... If you ask ME, I would that indeed, gopher+ is just like http. I see no interest in it... I like gopher for its bare simplicity, which allows to put any stuff online without any effort (and still gaving the possibility to represent documents in a nice way). However, I have to admit that Gopher+ support is on the todo list of my Gopher server (The Grumpy http & gopher server, remember?). ;-) But that support is rather a "for fun" entry, as I never really used Gopher+ myself. Best regards, Mateusz Viste -- You'll find my public OpenPGP key at gopher://gopher.viste-family.net/1/PGP -- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis -- -- File: signature.asc -- Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJJmcNxAAoJEC30Ty9xnkvbO/wH/igqOaJkmBNHLep9EEGGVml8 XVBuKlb0X0BMLJyUVD5+0YcEYJjq3pLnmeZew7VNGOdIHlkdh/Njw3Xni9gBBjI7 KvhpmUaG0RbkHQZnvdVqY8MxH7dvPicNPz3u1We6nl441d6qxXF5B1Ql2zoRbf9N vkd9wh/EQUQlVM0iqgsgxhzDr54Vs4d0pB3K8/dCFpOfmcQUZWYCDptRLELslNi5 J0XAjUllVDr0wbe4u01YqxoXiA9xX9P2fUUeYyNpqAQTIvckxxu4izbo2LCRNZHP 5TG9T+ylXSZHOvIqmfkoJDbP9tA1hOV7XLYGAoBoW2p2Pmi6iKE+8FxsPbkBov0= =FN0p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Thread start (DIR) [gopher] New Gopher server and client Thread start (DIR) [gopher] New Gopher server and client (DIR) Followup: [gopher] Re: New Gopher server and client (DIR) Followup: [gopher] Re: New Gopher server and client