From: gopher-project-bounces+rachael=telefisk.org@lists.alioth.debian.org
       Date: Sun May  2 20:42:45 2010
       Subject: Re: [gopher] The archived copy of Hal3000.cx is now up and running
       
       On 2010-05-02 21:26, Alex Nordlund wrote:
       
       > at gopher://gophernicus.org/1/archive.q?hal3000.cx:70/1,99808e0eb66fd016ae431be535d8b81d
       > when I try to download
       > gopher://hal3000.cx/9/Software/DOS/Games/phylox/phylox.ZIP
       > I just get:
       >
       > Failed to Connect
       > The connection was refused when attempting to contact hal3000.cx.
       
       I don't archive binaries, and when something isn't in the archive the 
       request gets redirected to the original server....
       
       ... which is dead.
       
       Question is, should I start archiving binaries too? Pros? Cons? Like I 
       said before, I wasn't going to archive anything, I was just doing a 
       search engine - and search engines don't index binaries.
       
       And yes, the URLs look ugly - the md5sum in the url was just a temporary 
       fix...
       
       
       
       - Kim
       
       _______________________________________________
       Gopher-Project mailing list
       Gopher-Project@lists.alioth.debian.org
       http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/gopher-project
       Thread start
 (DIR) [gopher] The archived copy of Hal3000.cx is now up and running
 (DIR) Followup: Re: [gopher] The archived copy of Hal3000.cx is now up and running