From: gopher-project-bounces+rachael=telefisk.org@lists.alioth.debian.org Date: Sun May 2 20:42:45 2010 Subject: Re: [gopher] The archived copy of Hal3000.cx is now up and running On 2010-05-02 21:26, Alex Nordlund wrote: > at gopher://gophernicus.org/1/archive.q?hal3000.cx:70/1,99808e0eb66fd016ae431be535d8b81d > when I try to download > gopher://hal3000.cx/9/Software/DOS/Games/phylox/phylox.ZIP > I just get: > > Failed to Connect > The connection was refused when attempting to contact hal3000.cx. I don't archive binaries, and when something isn't in the archive the request gets redirected to the original server.... ... which is dead. Question is, should I start archiving binaries too? Pros? Cons? Like I said before, I wasn't going to archive anything, I was just doing a search engine - and search engines don't index binaries. And yes, the URLs look ugly - the md5sum in the url was just a temporary fix... - Kim _______________________________________________ Gopher-Project mailing list Gopher-Project@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/gopher-project Thread start (DIR) [gopher] The archived copy of Hal3000.cx is now up and running (DIR) Followup: Re: [gopher] The archived copy of Hal3000.cx is now up and running