From: gopher-project-bounces+rachael=telefisk.org@lists.alioth.debian.org
       Date: Thu Jun 21 20:06:41 2012
       Subject: Re: [gopher] Draft RFC
       
       On 21/06/2012 18:36, Nick Matavka wrote:
       > Except URL: strings are "de facto" gopher.
       >
       > As for HTML, nobody says Gopher clients need to support HTML.
       > However, if a client does not support URL: and ALSO lacks support for
       > HTML, I'm not sure how to "fake" support for URL:.  With HTML support,
       > you can easily "fake" it, but without... well, I don't know.
       >
       
       Being able to render HTML and understanding http are two different 
       things though... If a gopher server serves up a url string with http as 
       the protocol that's just a signal for a gopher client to ignore it as it 
       can't follow the link :)
       
       _______________________________________________
       Gopher-Project mailing list
       Gopher-Project@lists.alioth.debian.org
       http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gopher-project
       Thread start
 (DIR) [gopher] Draft RFC
 (DIR) Followup: Re: [gopher] Draft RFC
 (DIR) Followup: Re: [gopher] Draft RFC