From: gopher-project-bounces+rachael=telefisk.org@lists.alioth.debian.org Date: Thu Jun 21 20:06:41 2012 Subject: Re: [gopher] Draft RFC On 21/06/2012 18:36, Nick Matavka wrote: > Except URL: strings are "de facto" gopher. > > As for HTML, nobody says Gopher clients need to support HTML. > However, if a client does not support URL: and ALSO lacks support for > HTML, I'm not sure how to "fake" support for URL:. With HTML support, > you can easily "fake" it, but without... well, I don't know. > Being able to render HTML and understanding http are two different things though... If a gopher server serves up a url string with http as the protocol that's just a signal for a gopher client to ignore it as it can't follow the link :) _______________________________________________ Gopher-Project mailing list Gopher-Project@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gopher-project Thread start (DIR) [gopher] Draft RFC (DIR) Followup: Re: [gopher] Draft RFC (DIR) Followup: Re: [gopher] Draft RFC