From: owner-hecnet@Update.UU.SE Date: Tue Nov 18 05:58:02 2014 Subject: Re: [HECnet] TOPS-10/20 copyright status On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 04:23:38PM -0800, Mark Abene wrote: > > If I remember correctly, Compuserve was using Foonlys towards the end, > since they were much more economical to run than the Systems Concepts > machines. Maybe someone can comment. That sounds backwards. At least the F1 was a very complex machine even requiring a DeC PDP-10 to even boot. The SC-40 was comparatively nimble. Lpok at gerrys youtibe videos. I don't know much about the later foonlys. I'd like to know more. /P Thread start (DIR) [HECnet] TOPS-10/20 copyright status (DIR) Followup: Re: [HECnet] TOPS-10/20 copyright status (DIR) Followup: Re: [HECnet] TOPS-10/20 copyright status (DIR) Followup: Re: [HECnet] TOPS-10/20 copyright status