I often think about pizzapal; aided by hearing pizzapal [ blasting Sisters of Mercy on the Aside; the book emphasises aNONradio openmic. common lisp 1ed's blandness in the pursuit of portability, One occasion was thumbing the somewhat presaging java ] foreward to Interlisp The Language And Its Usage by I came across lots of lit from Kaisler, a description of modern the 70s that LISP language lisp (interlisp or zetalisp authors shared knowledge of that (iirc smj's fav)) as of 1986 for I never read. Discussing pattern DARPA and then specifically matching facilities, citations interlisp-10 and interlisp-d. I include Kornfield [korn79], think I got it from the Waterman and Hayes-Roth interlisp medley pack floating [wate78], Shapiro [shap79], around. Winston and Horn [wins81], Charniak et al. [char80]. The citations in this book are incredible. One truth blossoming Discussions like this one forth from pizzapal's soul is underscore that there is not one the applicability of prolog universal best programming graph searches to intuitive technique; and different video game mechanics. techniques suit different purposes. One goal pursued by ILTLAIU is very clear that lisp the lisps was to escape is dominant in artificial artificial intelligence, and intelligence programming; lisp become a general purpose being garbage collection stapled programming language. I think to CAR CDR CONS EQ and a few ANSI common lisp 2ed succeeded, type predicates. But in practice but worlds of ground were ceded lots of higher level constructs to C-like languages. However I on top of these. We should think wonder if generality of purpose of LISP as a tool for building might be the same as being more powerful tools. worse.