(TXT) View source
       
       # 2018-02-05 - The Lost Language Of Plants by Stephen Harrod Buhner
       
 (IMG) Book cover
       
       This book covers a lot of ground including new age spirituality and
       science.  While i did not agree with all of the ideas, i enjoyed the
       thoughts provoked by reading them.  It pushed me to consider more
       about our relationship with plants.  Below are excerpts, with
       comments enclosed in square brackets.
       
       # Chapter 3
       
       > In consequence, language literally shapes personal experience of
       > reality..
       
       I began to notice that as i shifted from thinking in English to
       thinking in mathematics certain things would come into focus, could
       be seen, and others went out of focus, could not be seen. I was
       taking on and internalizing, as my studies progressed, the
       assumptions embedded within mathematics. That process of
       internalization had specific and immediate effects. My psychology
       changed, my personality changed, the range of emotional behavior
       available to me shifted, and how i interpreted other peoples'
       behaviors and thoughts shifted. Mathematical language, like all
       language, shifts personal experience of reality. Behavior shifts in
       response. ...
       
       The experiences encoded in mathematics, however, are different from
       those in other human languages. When thinking in mathematics human
       bodies, emotions, and interpersonal relationships take on less and
       less importance while the Universe as an expression of number
       relationship takes on more and more. There are ecstatic moments of
       insight and understanding, of course, but life, human or otherwise,
       has no linguistic place in the language of mathematics.
       
       The many, usually unexamined, assumptions woven into the fabric of
       mathematics--that numbers exist, that they possess meaning, that the
       language of number is important, that it is neutral and objective,
       that all things can be described in mathematical terms, that it is
       more real than other less precise languages--shape what
       mathematicians can "see" when they think in mathematical language. It
       is not a language that can express or see the organic process of
       life, human or otherwise--no birthing or child rearing, or love or
       need, no caring or bonding. A person thinking in mathematics cannot
       perceive the thing that passes between a puppy and a human being. It
       simply does not exist unless one shifts out of mathematics into
       another language. I realized, as time went by, that any language i
       used would shape my experience of the world around me.
       
       This realization took on much more importance to me than that of
       numbers or number theory. ...
       
       Later i came across the work of the mathematician Kurt Goedel. Asked
       to examine mathematics and refine the principles upon which it is
       based he determined that they could not be refined, that they are
       unprovable assumptions. And though mathematics follows logically from
       the underlying principles (and everything works nicely if you accept
       those principles are true), they cannot themselves be refined...
       unless you stand outside of the system itself. You cannot use the
       tools of a system to refine the system whose tools you are using. ...
       
       The implications of Godel's Incompleteness Theorem and Heisenberg's
       Uncertainty Principle are routinely ignored in most of the sciences.
       Specifically: the assumptions (mental perspectives) of the observer
       change what is being observed; scientific systems such as mathematics
       are based on unprovable, often unrefinable, assumptions; and to
       understand the limits of a system and refine its underlying
       assumptions it is necessary to stand outside of it, to literally be
       in a different system."
       
       # Chapter 4
       
       Because the experience of nature and other life-forms is so deeply
       interwoven into our emergence as a species, human beings possess a
       genetic predisposition for wild nature and for other
       life-forms--though it must, through specific experiences, be
       activated. Edward Wilson calls this innate feeling or caring for
       living forms and systems, for nature, biophilia. See also
       endosymbiosis.
       
       Wilson's description of the nature of biophilia recognizes that it is
       primarily an emotional affiliation with other life, not a mental
       process of recognizing the connections between bits of mechanical
       parts of the Universe that happen to inhabit a ball of rock in space.
       We are, by species history and genetic tendency, encoded for
       recognition of the aliveness of the world and an emotional bonding
       with it.
       
       -----
       
       > If you kill off the prairie dogs there will be no one to cry for
       > rain. --Navajo warning
       
       Amused scientists, knowing that there was no conceivable relationship
       between prairie dogs and rain, recommended the extermination of all
       burrowing animals in some desert areas planted to rangelands in the
       1950's "in order to protect the sparse desert grasses. Today the area
       (not far from Chilchinbito, Arizona) has become a virtual wasteland."
       --Bill Mollison, Permaculture
       
       > Water under the ground has much to do with rain clouds. If you
       > take the water from under the ground, the land will dry up.  --Hopi
       > elder
       
       Burrowing creatures, such as prairie dogs, open millions upon
       millions of tubes in the soils of Earth. As Mollison notes, these
       "burrows of spiders, gophers, and worms are to the soil what the
       aveoli of our lungs are to our body." As the moon passes overhead the
       underground aquifers rise and fall and Earth breathes out
       moisture-laden air. This exhalation of negative-ion-charged air
       through the many fissures and tubes opened by the burrowing creatures
       helps create rain.
       
       How could the indigenous peoples have known this? By all our
       standards of scientific knowledge they could not. We have neglected
       to realize that indigenous peoples have always had access to the
       finest probe ever conceived, one that makes scientific instruments
       coarse in comparison, one that all human beings in all places and
       times have had access to: the focused power of human consciousness.
       
       The continual immersion in nature where the bonding process is
       supported and encouraged allows it to deepen into biognosis--direct,
       depth knowledge of nature that cannot be reduced to the assembly of a
       collection of bits of accumulated information.
       
       It is worth noting that [environmental devastation] is not the work
       of ignorant people. Rather, it is largely the work by people with
       BAs, BSs, LLBs, MBAs, and PHDs. Elie Wiesel once made the same point,
       noting that the designers and perpetrators of Auschwitz, Dachau, and
       Buchenwald--the Holocaust--were the heirs of Kant and Goethe, widely
       thought to be the best educated people on earth. But their education
       did not serve as an adequate barrier to barbarity. What was wrong
       with their education? In Wiesel's words, "It emphasizes theories
       instead of values, concepts rather than human beings, abstraction
       rather than consciousness, answers rather than questions, ideology
       and efficiency rather than conscience."
       
        ... It is a matter of no small consequence that the only people
        who have lived sustainably on the planet for any length of time
        could not read, or like the Amish do not make a fetish of reading.
        --David Orr, Earth In Mind
       
       > A lot of what matters is the power and feeling of the
       > experience..  But when you put something in a museum, or even on
       > TV, you can see it all right, but you're really looking only at the
       > shell. --Barbara Smith, Navaho educator (in Nabhan and St. Antonio)
       
       The neurons and nerve cells, axons and dendrites in our brains
       contain the same microtubules that make up the bodies of spirochetes,
       or wriggling bacteria.
       
       [Ben's note, this brings to mind naegleriasis.  Naegleria Fowleri
       normally feed on bacteria, but they will also consume human brain
       cells.  Naegleriasis cannot be contracted via ingestion nor skin
       contact.  The amoeba must enter through the nasal passages where the
       neurotransmitter acetylcholine stimulates them to follow the
       olfactory nerve into the brain.]
       
       # Chapter 6
       
       In 1942, 50,000 U.S. servicemen developed acute hepatitis B from a
       contaminated yellow fever vaccine they were given three months
       earlier.  And it is now known that the tremendously high incidence of
       hepatitis C infection in Egypt came from physicians and health care
       workers using insufficiently sterilized needles during inoculations
       for a parasitic disease (schistosomiasis). ... And on a larger scale,
       the polio vaccine administered to 98 million Americans between 1955
       and 1963 is now known to have been contaminated with a simian virus,
       SV40.  It is estimated that at least 30 million Americans were
       infected as a result.  Monkey cells, contaminated with a virus not
       detectable at the time, were used in the production of the vaccine.
       There is growing evidence that SV40 plays a role in the development
       of a number of diseases, including some rare cancers.
       
       Bacteria are not germs but the germinators--and fabric--of all life
       on earth.  In declaring war on them we declared war on the underlying
       living structure of the planet--on all life-forms we can see--on
       ourselves.
       
       Clearly, the assumptions embedded in the germ theory of disease
       carried hidden impacts.  Accepting that theory as truth has led to
       behaviors--industrial, social, and environments--that are now being
       recognized as having serious long-term impacts.
       
       There is emerging evidence as well that human beings are supposed to
       have one or more species of intestinal worms that coevolved with us
       living in our GI tracts.  People in developing countries who usually
       have these parasites rarely develop inflammatory bowel diseases.
       Researchers have found that the worms engage in an intricate
       modulation of the bodys' immune system that positively affects bowel
       health.  When Americans were given the worms by a physician, a
       majority of those suffering inflammatory bowel diseases experienced
       complete remission of the disease.
       
       The kinds of healing that have been generated out of a
       universe-as-machine model are showing the same negative and
       long-lasting environmental impacts that are being found with other
       reductionist technologies.  Modern scientists and medical
       practitioners, by assuming that the other life-forms of Earth are not
       intelligent and that Earth and its life-forms can be viewed as a
       collection of unrelated parts, have initiated catastrophic changes
       throughout the living, holistic, life-form that is our planet...
       
       Failing to understand bacteria as our kin, the loss of biophilia in
       just this one area, has initiated responses from living organisms
       that conventional medical epistemology insisted were impossible.
       This profound error has not created a disease-free life with the
       major cause of death extreme old age, but an ecosystem in disarray
       and pathogenic bacteria more virulent and powerful than ever before.
       
       # Chapter 7
       
       Basically, the little that people currently know about plant
       chemistry is not very much.  This ignorance is magnified by our
       tendency (because of our upbringing) to think of plants as insentient
       salads or building materials engaged in chemical production processes
       that just happened by accident and, in consequence, have no purpose
       or meaning.  Phytoexistentialism.
       
       To keep their airways moist, plants transpire: they take up, or
       hydraulically lift, water from deep in the ground and breathe it out
       when they exhale.  On a hot summer day, a mature cottonwood tree can
       breathe out 100 gallons of water an hour.  It is so much cooler under
       a tree or in a forest not so much from the shade cast by the trees'
       leaves, but from the incredible amounts of moisture that the trees
       are exhaling.  Forests breathe out so much water vapor that from
       space it is actually possible to see the rain forest creating the
       clouds that precipitate later as rain.  Forests help cool Earth by
       keeping the air moist, by making clouds, by making rain.
       
       Hydraulic lifting goes on 24 hours a day.  At night, when their
       stomata are closed, the trees, and all deep-rooted plants, deposit
       the water they are bring up just under the surface of the soil.  Some
       they will use for transpiration the next day but about two-thirds is
       used by the neighboring plants as their primary water supply.  Trees
       literally water their community.  Whenever forests are
       removed--sometimes only half a forest has to be cut--the air and soil
       begin to dry up, rain becomes scarce, fires are more common, and the
       land starts to become a desert.
       
       # Chapter 8
       
       There is a King's holly in Tasmania that is 43,000 years old, a
       creosote bush in the American Southwest that is 18,000 years old, a
       box-huckleberry up north over 13,000...  Judging the actions of these
       plants, their functions in ecosystems, and their chemistries through
       the timescale of a human life often misses what can only happen in
       decades, centuries, or millenia.
       
       Conventional Western epistemologies limit conception of what plants
       can do, and short human attention spans interfere with being able to
       see plant functions that exist over extremely long cycles and large
       systems.  Most ecological field studies contribute to the problem:
       They are generally less than three years in length and 95 percent of
       them occur on plots less than 2.5 acres in size--half of them occur
       in a 9-square-foot area or smaller.  Few of the researchers have a
       personal long-term relationship with the area they are studying.
       Such difficulties of scale and time are compounded in a number of
       ways.  One is the language we use to name plants, the Latin binomials
       by which they are classified.
       
        ... Conventional scientific plant naming creates and sustains the
        illusion that plants such as osha exist in isolation from the
        animals, plants, people, and landscapes among whom and in which
        they grow, that no connections exist between them any anything
        else.  Like all language, botanical language shapes how the world
        is perceived and the unexamined assumptions that are embedded
        within it are reinforced the more it is used.
       
       [The author discusses ironwood as a fascinating example of a keystone
       species, then goes on to explain the importance of keystone species,
       biodiversity, and genetic fluidity.]
       
       For example, during spruce budworm infestations, spruce forests
       always contain trees that _do not_ produce alterations in terpene
       chemistry.  Researchers examining the trees have found that they
       _can_ increase their production, they simply do not.  In other words,
       these are not "weaker" trees that are simply succumbing to a
       Darwinian survival-of-the-fittest dynamic, but strongly healthy trees
       that are intentionally _not_ increasing chemistry production.  The
       long-range benefits of this are clear: By not raising antifeedant
       actions in all the trees, the forest makes sure that resistance does
       not develop in spruce budworms as it does in crop insects exposed to
       pesticides.  Plant communities literally set aside plants for the
       insects to consume so as to not force genetic rearrangement and the
       development of resistance.
       
       Insects such as the spruce budworm are essential parts of plant
       communities, they are not simply meaningless pests that arose in a
       vacuum and are trying to wipe out all spruce trees in a voracious
       desire to breed and feed.  Plants maintain neighborhood, community,
       and ecosystem health, including insect and animal population density
       and health, through their biofeedback mechanisms.
       
       "Scientists have changed our foods.  Take the USDA for example, they
       have bred out most of the cancer-preventing compounds in soy.  So an
       average primitive soybean will prevent more cancer than a USDA
       soybean.  This is because we Americans tend to go for bland foods and
       the primitive soybean has a more bitter taste, so the USDA bred out
       five different chemicals in soy, and bragged about it.  They bragged
       about lowering the phytate content, the bowman-burk inhibitor
       content, and the protease inhibitors, the very things that prevent
       cancer.  They bragged about breeding out or lowering the estrogenic
       isoflavones, which is what soy is getting all the press about these
       days.  They bragged about lowering the levels of sponins and
       phytosterols.  Yet, all of these have been shown to prevent cancer...
       And this happens across the board.  Food processors and food
       scientists are making our food less preventative--not only of cancer
       but also of cardiopathy." --John Duke, Herbal Voices Interview with
       Jim Duke
       
       # Chapter 10
       
       > It is not half so important to know as to feel.  --Rachel Carson
       
       Scientists have discovered that plant species may possess widely
       different chemistries depending on the time of day, week, or month
       they are picked.  And though the physicians laughed at them, the
       Appalachian folk healers would have understood and been unsurprised.
       For among them it was common knowledge that this plant must only be
       picked in the morning before the dew is off the leaves, or that one
       only by the light of the full moon.
       
        ... The solution is reconnection to the natural world and the
        living intelligence of the land.
       
       Many people believe we should first establish this reconnection in
       the young.  But i think the best hope for restoring biognosis is with
       the grown--those in whom the impulse for biophilia has been stunted,
       those in whom the interior wound is deep, those in whom the need is
       the greatest.  Though children express biophilia most naturally and
       it awakens most easily in them, industrial society has a deep and
       vested interest in its dominant epistemological perspective.  It will
       not look kindly on any effort to alter it in those future employees
       who are being trained to carry it on.
       
       The restoration of our capacity for biophilia begins with restoring,
       and supporting, our capacity for feeling.  And not just feeling in
       the grossest sense--feelings of anger or sadness or joy or fear--but
       the subtle feelings it is possible for us to perceive, if we desire
       to, in everything around us.
       
       We are born with a sophisticated capacity for detecting emotional
       nuances in the world around us. ... Restoring biophilia means
       exploring these nuances.  It means "coming to our senses," especially
       the sense of feeling--of touch--of being touched by the world. ...
       The experience cannot be written down nor found in books.  It can
       only be developed by opening up to the sophisticated capacity for
       feelings that we possess, by allowing ourselves to be touched by the
       livingness in the world, and exploring the meanings we encounter.
       
       [The author then proceeds to describe a series of exercises to
       reconnect and tune into ones feelings in order to access previously
       suppressed information.  You can read these exercises in the
       following linked post.
       
 (DIR) * Techniques For Restoring Biophilia
       ]
       
       # Chapter 11
       
       Thinking will never restore caring.  No matter how elegant the
       theory, the territory must still be entered and experienced.  It is
       deeply ironic that one of the most powerful antibiotics Alexander
       Fleming ever discovered is in human tears.
       
       "In true scientific fashion, let's look to the lab rat for
       understanding.  Instead of the variable warmth and textured surface
       of a wild home nest, it has a constant temperature and a stiff,
       unyielding cage floor.  Instead of a variety of smells changing
       according to the time of day, weather, and season, it has the
       chemical scents of a laboratory.  Instead of the kinesthetic
       experience of a social animal that lives in intimate physical contact
       with other members of its family, it is often placed in isolation.
       "Lab chow," hard, dry, and lacking in multiple chemistries, replaces
       the complex foods of various textures, moisture levels, and content
       that it would eat in the wild.  And what about the absence of wind,
       rain, and full-spectrum light?  Suddenly the "truth" of objective
       scientific data becomes curiously distorted."
       
       "Inspiration is like a wheel.  One person, if inspired and determined
       to learn all they can and let it radiate, will inspire another.  The
       wheel of inspiration, like that of destruction, has begun its
       downhill roll, and is gaining momentum.
       
       Inspiration can start a chain reaction when the elements of the
       moment are just right.  Inspiration is a force that often comes from
       some unconscious source, flowing into the conscious mind of a human
       and creating new ideas and ways of being."
       
       "A phenomenon evolves when someone is healed by a plant.  A
       connection begins and usually develops into deep respect and caring
       for that plant.  When wandering through the forest, if one comes
       across one of these plant allies, one instantly feels the connection.
       A bond evolves between plant and person, a love grows, and it is
       shown by the enthusiasm expressed when seeing it in flower.  This is
       how plants can weave us back into the web of life.  Then once again
       we know our place.  Once again are home.  Not only are our bodies
       healed but our spirits as well."
       
       "I spent two years living in what i now call 'a state of grace,' but
       which my parents called 'out of her mind.'  I found little cabins in
       the woods, lean-tos with moss-covered beds.  I stretched the levels
       of my comfort, walked barefoot through three seasons, and learned to
       receive nourishment on every level from the surrounding wilderness.
       I would lay on the ground, face close to the tip of a fir, and let
       the drops of water slowly filtering through the tree nourish me.  I
       ate nothing but what i gathered: fungi, berries, lichen, and fresh
       greens.  I became what i ate.  I was happy."
       
       author: Buhner, Stephen Harrod
       LOC:    RS164 .B785
 (HTM) detail: http://www.chelseagreen.com/the-lost-language-of-plants
       tags:   book,non-fiction,outdoor,spirit
       title:  The Lost Language Of Plants
       
       # Tags
       
 (DIR) book
 (DIR) non-fiction
 (DIR) outdoor
 (DIR) spirit