Subj : Is anyone getting these messages?
To   : Michele Marie Dalene
From : Mike Luther
Date : Thu Aug 23 2007 10:53 am

Hi Michele


 ML> I think you're better off running Maximus under a 
 ML> DOS/NT/W2k[+3]/XP VMware VM for Linux.

 MMD> I tried that as an expirement in the past. Running Maximus under
 MMD> Dosemu. Had problems with the Dos Squish. I don't 
 MMD> exactly remember what the problem was but I do 
 MMD> remember it was a show stopper. However running 
 MMD> Maximus/squish under a true MSDOS environment worked 
 MMD> well. I am considering that here but... I need to get 
 MMD> a stick of sdram for the boxen that I am considering 
 MMD> for this task.
 MMD>         Until then I am glad to just see my uplink 
 MMD> has worked around the problem.
 MMD>                                 Michele Marie Dalene

I'm wondering for another reason relative to running other than MAX DOS 
applications in WIN or LINUX, thus the additional question here.  Which might 
be related to this for MAX as well.

Is there a difference between DOSEMU in LINUX and the, in theory,utility called 
DOSBOX which is supposed to be a 'standardized' way to work with DOS on 
everything from OS/2 to LINUX to UNIX to WINwhatever to BEA and so on?

If DOSBOX is a different took than DOSEMU and DOSEMU isn't directly being 
worked on for WINwhatever and so on, then some of the expected issues relative 
to comm port use, old-time IRQ management, printing needs and file 
name/directory coordination might get solved faster and better, whatever that 
means, on an application development group effort than spans multiple O/S 
needs.

Thoughts and help here, anyone?


--> Sleep well; OS/2's still awake! ;)

Mike @ 1:117/3001

--- Maximus/2 3.01
 * Origin: Ziplog Public Port (1:117/3001)

.