Subj : Re: Christopher Columbus: America's first Republican To : All From : Besque Date : Sun Dec 09 2012 06:49 pm On 10/10/2012 10:53 AM, SaPeIsMa wrote: > > "linuxgal" wrote in message > news:oL6dnY6x0ccrfenNnZ2dnUVZ_v-dnZ2d@giganews.com... >> deep wrote: >>> On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 17:55:02 -0700, linuxgal >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Fred^2 wrote: >>>> >>>>> Christian shitbox Republicunts would scream bloody murder if their own >>>>> history was actually taught. >>>> >>>> The one where Republicans like Lincoln and Grant freed the slaves from >>>> the Democrap rednecks and peckerwoods? Or later history when >>>> Republican >>>> Martin Luther King related his dream? >>> >>> Only idiots who know nothing of Civil War history would call Lincoln a >>> Republican in today's sense. >> >> The topic is not "today's sense" because that's current events. The >> topic, set by yourself, is "Republicunt history". >> > > But if we are to argue, that Republicans shifted somewhat from the > Original platform of the Republican party under Lincoln, then sadly we > have to conclude that the Democrats have NOT shifted ONE BIT from the > Democratic Party position at the time of Lincoln > If you remember, they were the ones all for keeping Slavery. > The only difference is that today, instead of using whips and > chains, they do it with financial enslavement called entitlements, under > various names, like welfare, Equal opportunity, and so forth. > Black people were owned by Democrats before the Civil WAR, and Democrats still _own_ black people. > > --- MBSE BBS v0.95.15 (GNU/Linux-i386) * Origin: Public Usenet Newsgroup Access (1:116/18@fidonet) .