---------------------------------------- gopher rings August 11th, 2018 ---------------------------------------- From ze libertine gamer [0] on Mastodon: (DIR) [0] ze libertine gamer <zlg> Places like Bongusta and phlogroll remind me of web-rings from the 1990s. Let's name'em gopher-rings, or perhaps gopher dens if we want to be cute. They serve the same function: building a network with volunteer participants (the curation process) and technology that empowers the individual (self-hosting and moku-pona). What do you think, #gopher? tfurrows [1] also posted a semi-related phlog [2] today on favorites and the tools that engineer our interactions. (DIR) [1] tfurrows - sdf (TXT) [2] tfurrows - favorites - - - - - - - - I started thinking about a response on Mastodon, but my head flooded with too many things to fit in 500 characters. A phlog is a better medium, I think. In the nascent web we had many ways of finding each other and other content that seems archaic or obtuse in retrospect. In the very earliest days I kept a paper notebook where I manually wrote down email addresses and websites. Later web-rings became popular ways to link like-content to one another, forming communities from the ether. By the time search engines came online we had all sorts of other ways to bridge the gaps. I think back to my time using AltaVista, or Lycos, or Yahoo!, finding them awkward and lacking, and returning to the advice of a webring or forum to find real relevant sites. I would cast a broader net using a meta-search engine like SavvySearch and click through pages and pages of results. That method of exploring the web didn't take over in prominance for me, personally, until Google began their takeover. Web-rings fell to the wayside quickly as "googling" entered the lexicon, and I don't think I consciously realized the "engineering" or "channeled usage", as tfurrows puts it, was so broadly affecting my behavior until very recently. In my head, search engines are tools and I use them. If I am careful to avoid tracking behaviors, they don't use me, right? Well, maybe not. Google's algorithms, or a browser's "favorites" screen guides our hand and our habits in a major way. We engage with what we see and what we find, and that is a power that shouldn't be forgotten. So, thinking on ze libertine gamer's idea, I think the gopher aggregators, the gopher-rings, are very much a throwback to the old days when communities were more manually linked to one another. There is still a power inherent in the tools we use, no different than Google wields, or Firefox, but because it's curated by participants in the community (like me!), I feel better about it. Our micro-aggregators aren't monolithic. Anyone can run one, thanks to the awesome utilities shared around the community. My phlog roll [3] began as a personal tool for me to track the phlogs I read. It's become a very popular starting point for others as well, and so I added some language to the top on how to get new sites added. Inclusion on my aggregator is open to all, as long as your phlog is in a format that moku-pona can handle. I don't want to be a barrier to finding gopher content; I want to be an easy entry-point. (DIR) [3] gopher.black phlog roll Have a site that you want added? Drop me an email at one of the addresses in my contact page on this gopher hole, or reach out on Mastodon. I try to watch SDF, grex, and the tilde communities for new holes that pop up so I can add them quickly. I generally wait until a phlog has at least two posts before I add it to avoid the "hello world" phenomenon that litters SDF. Just hit me up if you see something missing.