From: "Gopher-Project" <gopher-project-bounces+rachael=telefisk.org@lists.alioth.debian.org> Date: Thu Apr 23 18:29:16 2015 Subject: Re: [gopher] Gopher+ support in the community James Mills <prologic@shortcircuit.net.au> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Cameron Kaiser <spectre@floodgap.com> > wrote: > > > I'm not opposed to Gopher over TLS, but I definitely would not want it to > > be > > mandatory, and it would increase client burden as well particularly with > > respect to certificate management. > > > > +1 on Gopher over TLS being optional. I'm also in support of optional TLS. As for gopher+ I think it's the proverbial kicked dead equine. BTW, why are we discussing TLS in a "gopher+" thread? They aren't really related - better to give TLS its own thread, no? Jeff / gopher://jgw.mdns.org _______________________________________________ Gopher-Project mailing list Gopher-Project@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gopher-project Thread start (DIR) [gopher] Gopher+ support in the community (DIR) Followup: Re: [gopher] Gopher+ support in the community (DIR) Followup: Re: [gopher] Gopher+ support in the community (DIR) Followup: Re: [gopher] Gopher+ support in the community (DIR) Followup: Re: [gopher] Gopher+ support in the community (DIR) Followup: Re: [gopher] Gopher+ support in the community