From: "Gopher-Project" <gopher-project-bounces+rachael=telefisk.org@lists.alioth.debian.org>
       Date: Mon Feb  6 00:34:13 2017
       Subject: Re: [gopher] Gophernicus 2.4 "Millennium Edition" released
       
       --===============5329436748256152650==
       Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c19bee05b08a50547d0f240
       
       --94eb2c19bee05b08a50547d0f240
       Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
       
       Can we just assume TLS if the destination port in the menu is 73 for
       example?
       
       
       James Mills / prologic
       
       E: prologic@shortcircuit.net.au
       W: prologic.shortcircuit.net.au
       
       On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Kim Holviala <kim@holviala.com> wrote:
       
       >
       > > On 04 Feb 2017, at 12:11, Cameron Kaiser <spectre@floodgap.com> wrote:
       > >
       > >> The only remaining problem is to figure out a way to tell which
       > connections
       > >> are TLS and which are plaintext in gopher menus. Alternative is not to
       > >> change menus at all and require the clients to read caps.txt first to
       > see
       > >> if there is a non-zero ServerTLSPort available for encrypted
       > connections.
       > >> That might actually be the most backwards-compatible method.
       > >
       > > That would certainly seem the most reasonable approach to me.
       >
       > I agree. I tried to come up with a way to add some kind of "encrypted or
       > not" flag in the menus... but the existing servers and clients out there
       > are *so* broken that I couldn't come up with a way that would not break
       > things.
       >
       > Oh well. Some day I'll try to patch Lynx or something to work with gopher
       > over TLS.
       >
       >
       >
       > - Kim
       > _______________________________________________
       > Gopher-Project mailing list
       > Gopher-Project@lists.alioth.debian.org
       > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gopher-project
       >
       
       --94eb2c19bee05b08a50547d0f240
       Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
       Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
       
       <div dir=3D"ltr">Can we just assume TLS if the destination port in the menu=
        is 73 for example?</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br clear=3D"all"><div>=
       <div class=3D"gmail_signature" data-smartmail=3D"gmail_signature"><span sty=
       le=3D"border-collapse:collapse;color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px"><br><=
       font face=3D"arial, sans-serif">James Mills / prologic</font><br><br><font =
       face=3D"arial, sans-serif"></font><font face=3D"&#39;courier new&#39;, mono=
       space">E:=C2=A0<a href=3D"mailto:prologic@shortcircuit.net.au" style=3D"col=
       or:rgb(0,0,204)" target=3D"_blank">prologic@shortcircuit.net.au</a></font><=
       /span><div><span style=3D"font-family:&#39;courier new&#39;,monospace;color=
       :rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px">W:=C2=A0</span><a href=3D"http://prologic=
       .shortcircuit.net.au" style=3D"font-family:&#39;courier new&#39;,monospace;=
       font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,204)" target=3D"_blank">prologic.shortcircuit.=
       net.au</a><br></div></div></div>
       <br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Kim Holviala=
        <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:kim@holviala.com" target=3D"_blank=
       ">kim@holviala.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quot=
       e" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">=
       <span class=3D""><br>
       &gt; On 04 Feb 2017, at 12:11, Cameron Kaiser &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:spectre=
       @floodgap.com">spectre@floodgap.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
       &gt;<br>
       &gt;&gt; The only remaining problem is to figure out a way to tell which co=
       nnections<br>
       &gt;&gt; are TLS and which are plaintext in gopher menus. Alternative is no=
       t to<br>
       &gt;&gt; change menus at all and require the clients to read caps.txt first=
        to see<br>
       &gt;&gt; if there is a non-zero ServerTLSPort available for encrypted conne=
       ctions.<br>
       &gt;&gt; That might actually be the most backwards-compatible method.<br>
       &gt;<br>
       &gt; That would certainly seem the most reasonable approach to me.<br>
       <br>
       </span>I agree. I tried to come up with a way to add some kind of &quot;enc=
       rypted or not&quot; flag in the menus... but the existing servers and clien=
       ts out there are *so* broken that I couldn&#39;t come up with a way that wo=
       uld not break things.<br>
       <br>
       Oh well. Some day I&#39;ll try to patch Lynx or something to work with goph=
       er over TLS.<br>
       <span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888"><br>
       <br>
       <br>
       - Kim<br>
       </font></span><div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5">_____________________=
       _________<wbr>_________________<br>
       Gopher-Project mailing list<br>
       <a href=3D"mailto:Gopher-Project@lists.alioth.debian.org">Gopher-Project@li=
       sts.alioth.<wbr>debian.org</a><br>
       <a href=3D"http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gopher-p=
       roject" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://lists.alioth.debian.<wb=
       r>org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/<wbr>gopher-project</a><br>
       </div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
       
       --94eb2c19bee05b08a50547d0f240--
       
       
       --===============5329436748256152650==
       Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
       MIME-Version: 1.0
       Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
       Content-Disposition: inline
       
       _______________________________________________
       Gopher-Project mailing list
       Gopher-Project@lists.alioth.debian.org
       http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gopher-project
       --===============5329436748256152650==--
       Thread start
 (DIR) [gopher] Gophernicus 2.4 "Millennium Edition" released
 (DIR) Followup: Re: [gopher] Gophernicus 2.4 "Millennium Edition" released